|
Carroll v Eitheiler, 1 F 688 (ED
Pa, 6
April 1880)
Parker v School District, 73
Tenn
(5 Lea) 525 (Sep 1880)
Kensett v Stivers, et al, 10 F 517 (SD NY, 8 Nov
1880) (tax case)
Hier, et al v Abrahams, et al, 82 NY (37 Sickels)
519 (16 Nov 1880) (trademark
case, alleging fraudulent imitation)
Bradley v Murray, 66 Ala 269 (Dec 1880) (divorce
case, tobacco is not a "necessity" for spouse to provide)
Mueller v State, 76 Ind 310; 40 Am Rep 245 (May
1881) (addiction
case)
Guiteau's Case, 10 F 161-203; 14 Am St Trials 1-158 (DC,
25 Jan 1882) (smoker
crime case,
insanity defense re 25 July 1881
Garfield assassination)
Nash v Page, 80
Ky 539, 44 Am Rep 490 (Sep 1882) (public
tobacco warehouse case banning discrimination)
Turner
v State of Maryland, 107 US 38; 2 S Ct 44; 27 L Ed 370 (La,
5 Feb 1883) (business
practices case, affirming constitutionality of state tobacco
inspection law; conviction in state court upheld)
Snyder
v Marks, 109 US 189; 3 S Ct 157; 27 L Ed 901 (2 Nov 1883)
(tax case)
Heard v Flannagan, 10 Victoria Law Rpts 1 (1884) (fire
case)
Re Paul, 94 NY 497 (Jan 1884) (banning
tobacco manufacture outside factories, in rooms and apartments)
17 Opinions US Attorney General 646 (25 Jan 1884) (tax
case, classification of tobacco scraps)
Matter of Jacobs, 33 Hun 374; 2 NY Cr 346 (Oct 1884) (tobacco
manufacture in tenements)
Snyder
v U.S., 112 US 216; 5 S Ct 118; 28 L Ed 697 (La, 17 Nov
1884) (tax
case)
Matter of Jacobs, 2 NY Cr 539; 98 NY 98; 50 Am Rep 636
(20 Jan 1885). SCB: 33 Hun 374; 2 NY Cr 346
Cohn v Spalding, 24 Fed 19 (CC
ND Ill, 26 May 1885) (tax
case, classification of tobacco scraps)
Blackwell Durham Co v McElwe, 94 NC 425 (Feb 1886)
(trademark case)
Turpin
v Burgess, 117 US 504; 6 S Ct 835; 29 L Ed 988 (5 April
1886) (tax case, alleging tax on tobacco manufacture was on exports,
banned by the constitution)
Bloete v Simon, 19 Abb NC 88 (NY, May 1887) (business
practices label case)
Eaton v Lancaster, 79 Me 477; 10 A 449 (29 June
1887) (fire
case)
Strasser v Moonelis, 11 Cent Rep 461; 108 NY 611
(6 March 1888). SCB: 23 Jones & S 197 (union
label case)
People v Fisher, 57 Sup Ct Rep N Y (50 Hun) 552
(NY, Jan 1889) (cigar
label case)
State v Ohmer, 34 Mo App 115 (5 Feb 1889) (cigar
sale ban, leading to this early
addiction
case)
Cigar Makers Protective Union No 98 v Conley, 40
Minn 243; 3 LRA 125 (11 March 1889) (fraudulent
use of label case)
Commonwealth v Marzynski, 149 Mass 68; 21 NE 228
(6 May 1889)
Carson v Ury, 39 F 777; 5 LRA 614 (CA
Mo, 2 Sep 1889) (business
practices case alleging fraudulent label)
Talbott v Stemmons' Executor, 89 Ky 222; 12 SW 297
(24 Oct 1889) (Kentucky
case upholding decedent's promise to will $500 if grandson
remained nonsmoking)
Kaufman v Farley Mfg Co, 78
Iowa 679;
43 NW 612 (28 Oct 1889) (cigar
jobber termination case)
|
