|
C. C. Taft Co v State of Iowa, 252 US 569; 40 S Ct
345; 64 L Ed 720 (15 March 1920). SCB: 183 Iowa 548; 167 NW 467; 9 ALR
390
Taylor v Industrial Commission, 31 OCA 390; 13
Ohio App 262 (19 June 1920)
State v Nossaman, 107 Kan 715; 193 P 347; 20 ALR
921 (6 Nov 1920)
Palmer v Keene Forestry Ass'n, 80 NH 68; 112 A 798
(1 Feb 1921) (smoking-caused
fire case)
Jefferson v Derbyshire Farmers, Ltd, [1920] All
Eng 129; 2 KB 281; 13 ALR 989 (3 Feb 1921)
United Cigar Stores Co v United Confectioners, 92
NJ Eq 449; 113 A 226; 17 ALR 779 (28 Feb 1921) (unfair
competition by deceptive similarity to another's business)
Gray v Central Warehouse Co, 181 NC 166; 106 SE
657 (6 April 1921) (conspiracy in restraint of trade case)
Beech Nut Packing Co v P. Lorillard Co, 287 F 271
(D SD NY, 9 June 1921)
Nossaman v State of Kansas, 258 US 633; 42 S Ct
314; 66 L Ed 802 (20 March 1922). SCB: 107 Kan 715; 193 P 347
Jones v Union Guano Co, 183 NC 338; 111 SE 612 (19
April 1922) (tobacco
farmer case saying deleterious ingredients in fertilizer injured
tobacco crop).
Schwartz v Michigan Warehouse Co, 219 Mich 401;
189 NW 1 (20 July 1922)
Feeney v Standard Oil Co, 58 Cal App 587; 209 P 85
(20 July 1922)
Federal Trade Commission v P Lorillard Co and
American Tobacco Co, Inc, 283 F 999 (D SD NY, J. Manton, 3 Oct
1922) (discovery denied)
Ottinger v School District No 25, 157 Ark 82; 247
SW 789 (5 Feb 1923)
Wright v Hirsch, 155 Ga 229; 116 SE 795 (2 March
1923) (tax
case)
Tobacco Growers' Co-op Assn v Jones, 185 NC 265;
117 SE 174 (11 April 1923) (conspiracy in restraint of trade case)
Storm v Industrial Accident Commission, 191 Cal 4;
214 P 874 (12 April 1923)
Payne v Combs, 198 Ky 749; 249 SW 1031 (24 April
1923)
State v P Lorillard Co, 181 Wis 347; 193 NW 613 (1
May 1923) (conspiracy in restraint of trade case)
Springer v North, 205 App Div 754; 200 NYS 248 (19
June 1923)
Keyser Canning Co v Klots Throwing Co, 94 W Va
346; 118 SE 521; 31 ALR 283 (26 June 1923) (fire
case, court recommended
firing
the smoker causing it)
Brown v City of Thomasville, 156 Ga 260; 118 SE
854 (7 Sep 1923) (cigarette
license denial case)
Northern Wisconsin Cooperative Tobacco Pool v Bekkedal,
182 Wis 571; 197 NW 936 (13 Nov 1923)
Kaletha v Hall Mercantile Co, 157 Minn 290; 196 NW
261 (7 Dec 1923) (worker's compensation case, fire-issue, employee
Santa Claus' beard set ablaze)
Potter v Dark Tobacco Growers' Co-op Assn, 201 Ky
441; 257 SW 33 (Ky App, 21 Dec 1923) (four-year pooling agreement)
Adams v Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co,
295 F 586 (CA 4, SC, 5 Feb 1924)
Jones
v Union Guano Co, 264 US 171; 44 S Ct 280; 68 L Ed 623 (NC,
18 Feb 1924) (tobacco
farmer case saying deleterious ingredients in fertilizer injured
tobacco crop). SCB: 183 NC 338; 111 SE 612
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co v Loftin, 99 So 13
(Miss, 25 Feb 1924) (dangerous
tobacco case)
Federal Trade Com'n v Errera, 7 FTC 375 (5 March
1924) (unfair
competition by deceptive similarity to another's business)
Federal
Trade Commission
v American Tobacco Co, 264 US 298; 44 S Ct 336; 68 L Ed 696
(17 March 1924) (business
practices case; issue of discovery subpoena to ascertain any
unfair competition). SCB: 283 F 999
Tanton v McKenney, 226 Mich 245; 197 NW 510; 33
ALR 1175 (24
March 1924) (student expelled from teaching college, due to
tobacco addiction)
Beech Nut Packing Co v P. Lorillard Co, 299 F 834
(D NJ, 7 May 1924)
Dark Tobacco Growers' Co-op Assn v Mason, 150
Tenn
228; 263 SW 60 (7 June 1924) (its arbitrariness, coercion and
suppression doesn't necessarily make the association illegal)
Lloyd v Richardson, 158 Ga 633; 124 SE 37 (23 July
1924) (tax
case)
Dark Tobacco Growers' Co-op Assn v Dunn, 150
Tenn
614; 266 SW 308 (29 Nov 1924)
Kraus v American Tobacco Co, 72
Penn
L J 844 (1924) (dealer alleging manufacturer
conspiracy in restraint of trade)
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co v Stringer, 103 So 5
(Miss, 2 March 1925) (product
liability case)
Kraus v American Tobacco Co, 283 Pa 146; 129 A 60
(13 April 1925). SCB: 72 PLJ 844
Beech Nut Packing Co v P. Lorillard Co, 7 F2d 967
(CA 3, NJ, 11 Sep 1925). SCB: 299 F 834.
Kraus v American Tobacco Co, 284 Pa 569; 131 A 487
(23 Nov 1925). SCB: 72 PLJ 844; 283 Pa 146, 129 A 60
American Tobacco Co v FTC, 9 F2d 570 (CA 2, J.
Manton, 20 Oct 1925) (unfair trade case). SCB: 283 F 999
Brame v Dark Tobacco Growers Co-op, 212 Ky 185;
278 SW 597; 62 CJ 1075 n 8 (18 Dec 1925)
Burley Tobacco Growers Co-op Assn v Rogers, 88 Ind
App 469; 150 NE 384 (27 Jan 1926) (conspiracy in restraint of trade
case)
Rhode Island
Hospital Trust Co
v Doughton, 270 US 69; 46 S Ct 256; 70 L Ed 475 (1 March
1926) (tax
case)
List v Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-op Assn, 114
Ohio St 361; 151 NE 471 (16 March 1926) (business
practices case)
Tobacco Growers' Co-op. Ass'n v Danville Warehouse Co,
144 Va 456; 132 SE 482 (16 March 1926) (business
practices case)
Tiralongo v Stanley Works, 104 Conn 331; 133 A 98
(8 April 1926) (worker's compensation case, involving fire)
Gospel v Southern Carbon Co, 4 La App 272 (7 May
1926)
Mack v Hugger Brothers Construction Co, 153
Tenn
260; 283 SW 448 (22 May 1926) (fire
case)
Burley Tobacco Growers Co-op Assn v Samples, 215
Ky 276; 284 SW 1069 (Ky App, 22 June 1926) (tobacco pooling case;
issue of whether the entire crop was delivered, was for the jury to
decide)
Flowers v Williams-Rieves Lumber Co, 5 La App 49
(30 June 1926)
State v Salt Lake Tribune Publishing Co, 68 Utah
187; 249 P 474 (17 Sep 1926)
Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co v United States, 61 Ct
Cls 693 (15 Dec 1926)
Burley Tobacco Growers Co-op Assn v Devine, 217 Ky
320; 289 SW 253 (Ky App, 17 Dec 1926) (a tobacco farmer can stop
raising tobacco; but not to evade the tobacco pool, via pretense of
having transferred the farming to his daughter)
Lionel's Cigar Store v McFarland, 162 La 956; 111
So 341 (3 Jan 1927) (tax
case)
Northern Wisconsin Cooperative Tobacco Pool v Oleson,
191 Wis 586; 211 NW 923 (11 Jan 1927)
Beech Nut Packing Co v P. Lorillard Co, 273 US
629; 47 S Ct 481; 71 L Ed 810 (11 April 1927). SCB 299 F 834, 7 F2d
967
Liggett &
Myers Tobacco Co
v U.S., 274 US 215; 47 S Ct 581; 71 L Ed 1006 (2 May 1927)
(t). SCB: 61 Ct Cls 693
Federal
Trade Commission
v American Tobacco Co, 274 US 543; 47 S Ct 663; 71 L Ed
1193 (31 May 1927). SCB: 9 F2d 570
Doscher v Query, 21 F2d 521 (ED SC, 15 Aug 1927) (tax
case)
Weiner v Commonwealth, 221 Ky 455; 298 SW 1075 (21
Oct 1927)
Burley Tobacco Growers Co-op Assn v Pennebaker Home
for Girls, 221 Ky 718; 299 SW 734 (25 Oct 1927) (issue of stolen
tobacco, in a pooling situation)
Liberty
Warehouse Co
v Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-op Marketing, 276 US 71; 48 S
Ct 291; 72 L Ed 473 (20 Feb 1928) (private remedy for
unlawful trade
practices; with history of such cases)
Asotsky v Beach, 319 Mo 810; 5 SW2d 22; 62
ALR 95 (9
April 1928) (tax
case)
Burley Tobacco Growers Co-op Assn v Boyd, 6 SW2d
241 (Ky App, 1 May 1928) (failure to account for the tobacco delivered
to the pool)
Exchange Drug Co v State Tax Commission, 218
Alabama 115; 117 So 673 (10 May 1928) (tax
case)
Compania General de Tabacos de Filipinas, 26 Philippines
Official Gazette #65 p 1712 (31 May 1928) (tax case)
Smokador Mfg Co v Tubular Products Co, 27 F2d 948
(D Conn, 18 July 1928) (trademark
infringement issues)
Fischer v R. Hoe & Co, Inc, 224 App Div 335; 230
NYS 755 (20 Sep 1928)
Burley Tobacco Growers Co-op Assn v Tipton, 11
SW2d 119 (Ky App, 27 Nov 1928) (case re the 1% fee to the pooling
association, issue of its alleged inactivity)
Exchange Drug Co v State Tax Commission, 278 US
577; 49 S Ct 176; 73 L Ed 515 (2 Jan 1929). SCB: 218 Alabama 115; 117
So 673 (tax
case)
Porto Rican-American Tobacco Co v American Tobacao Co,
30 F2d 234 (CA 2, PR, 7 Jan 1929) cert den 279 US 858 (1929) (monopoly
issue, predatory pricing, dumping below cost in Puerto Rico to
undercut competition)
Wickham v Glenside Woolen Mills, 225 App Div 838;
232 NYS 917 (16 Jan 1929)
State v Lagomarcino-Grupe Co, 207
Iowa 621;
223 NW 512 (5 Feb 1929) (licensing
aspects case)
Smokador Mfg Co v Tubular Products Co, 31 F2d 255
(CA 2, Conn, 4 March 1929). SCB: 27 F2d 948 (trademark
infringement issues)
Burley Tobacco Growers Co-op Assn v Roeder, 88 Ind
App 649; 165 NE 330 (6 March 1929) (fraud allegations)
Gilchrist
v Interborough Rapid Transit Co, 279 US 159; 49 S Ct 282;
73 L Ed 652 (NY, 8 April 1929) (rapid transit rate case, referencing
ban on having more than one smoking car per train)
Compania
General de Tabacos de Filipinas, 279 US 306; 49 S Ct 304; 73 L
Ed 704 (8 April 1929). SCB: 26 POG #65 p 1712
Brennan v City of Seattle, 151 Wash 665; 276 P 886
(23 April 1929)
American Tobacco Co v Porto Rican-American Tobacco Co,
279 US 858; 49 S Ct 353; 73 L Ed 999 (29 April 1929). SCB 30 F2d 234
Yore v Pacific Gas & Electric Co, 99 Cal App 81;
277 P 878 (21 May 1929)
Mack v Hugger Brothers Construction Co, 10 Tenn
App 402 (20 July 1929)
Wickham v Glenside Woolen Mills, 252 NY 11; 168 NE
446 (15 Oct 1929). SCB: 225 App Div 838; 232 NYS 917
|
