Home

|  Table of Contents

|         Court Forms  | Law Journals  |  Law Students | Law Dictionary  | News

     

USSupremeCourtCases.US

  BankruptcyCode.US
     

   United States

  United States Law.US
     

Supreme Court

  US Government
     

Opinion

  US Tax Center
 US Codes | State Codes Federal Civil Procedure

| FederalCriminalProcedure

|   Legal News

| Lawyers
                                                 


A Legal and Business Portal

 

 

   
   
Social Security |  Finance   Hotels

US History

Restaurants

 Entertainment

World Directory

   

 

 


Free Legal Education starstar
US Business Directory |
New York News
California Writs  
Immigration Center
star
Attorney Yellow Pages
Abogados De Accidentes
(Accident Attorneys)

My eLawOffice   
My Health and Fitness Guide
Celebrity Gossip

Table of Casesstar  
University Law School     
California Case Law
California Criminal law  
California Jury Instructions
Legal News
star New York News
First Amendment
Fourth Amendment
Fifth Amendment
Sixth Amendment 
California Case Law 
Blogs on the Supreme Court and Constitutional Rights
Supreme Court News Links


United States
Supreme Court Opinion
Table of Casesstar

Abadie v. United States, 149 U. S. 261 (1893)
Abadie v. United States, 149 U. S. 261 (1893)

United States Supreme Court Cases

 

 
 

 

   
 
Cases citing this case: Supreme Court
Cases citing this case: Circuit Courts

U.S. Supreme Court

ABADIE v. U S, 149 U.S. 261 (1893)

149 U.S. 261

ABADIE
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 260.
 

May 1, 1893

James Herrman, for appellant.

Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for the United States. [149 U.S. 261, 262]  

Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.

This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court of the United States for the northern district of California, in a proceeding under the act of congress of February 25, 1885, entitled 'An act to prevent unlawful occupancy of the public lands,' (23 St. p. 321,) whereby appellant was directed to remove a fence and inclosure from certain sections of land therein described, in default of which it was decreed that the same should be destroyed by the marshal for said district. The value of the fence was claimed to exceed $5,000; but the fence was not the matter in dispute, nor was the appellant deprived thereof. For want of the jurisdictional amount ( Cameron v. U. S., 146 U.S. 533 , 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 184) the appeal must be dismissed.

 

spacer bar


Table of Casesstar   
 

 

                                          



















 

                               
 

Advertisers

                                     

  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

Back To Top

         

 

          

   

       

     

 Table of Cases  
Tobacco Cases 1808-2007   
My eLawOffice
My Health and Fitness Guide
University Law School     
California Case Law
California Criminal law 
California Jury Instructions
Legal News
First Amendment
Fourth Amendment
Fifth Amendment
Sixth Amendment  
Blogs on the Supreme Court and Constitutional Rights 
Supreme Court News Links


Thomas - Legislative Information on the Internet |Check Your Credit Score | UN Treaty Reference Guide
Directory of Medical Dictionaries |
California Injury (Torts) Law | Yaazoo! | Shopping
USA Entertainment.US | FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | United Statea News |
Travel |
FederalCriminalProcedure.Com | iLaw Dictionary.Com |
Library of Congress |
United States Law Consumer Law  | USA Entertainment.US |
starUnited States News
iBusiness Center.US | United States Law: Constitutional Law: Constitutions of  The World

California Contracts Law.Com | California Injury (Torts) Law | Advanced Trial Handbook
Phone Directories From Around the World New | California Law Revision Commission | Federal Courts
California Civil Procedure.Com | Advanced Trial Handbook-Ervin A. Gonzalez, Esq.
Yaazoo! | Abogados Latinos | United States History | Spanish | Federal Courts | Federal Rules of Evidence


©

Copyright 2003 by  - USSupremeCourtCases.US™©  All Rights Reserved

Previous Page